Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mel Hoyt's avatar

RR is always comprehensive and thoughtful in his analysis. No way does AMPTP or any other third party own an AI likeness of anyone. Who knows where it could end up. Think hackers. There is no point in anyone belonging to an union if the union cannot protect them in a fair manner. These 2 unions create the product and own it. They have the right to refuse to give it to anyone for any amount of money in perpetuity. The other unions make the creative vision happen. In film school I have heard it said that directors produce the shot list. That said, there should be no settlement on bad terms with AMPTP no matter how long it takes. Frankly these unions should be looking at financing in order to start their own studio/distribution. Why not? The top talent belongs to them. All existing AMPTP parties can do is look for new talent in all areas and build from scratch. Let’s see how long the newbies want to work for nothing. To get a perspective on all this read French economist Thomas Piketty’s second book titled “Capitalism and Ideology” as well as his first one titled “Capitalism.” (Essentially Labor is devalued compared to Capital which is by and large idle capital today creating a huge imbalance.). HANG TOUGH UNIONS.

Expand full comment

No posts