Please don’t take this too harshly Elaine, but your beat is the strike. CNBC’s David Faber just reported that the strike is likely to end tomorrow. (And if it doesn’t end tomorrow, then it won’t end until 2024.) That is major info that has to be in an update like this.
What cares what some pundit at CNBC has to say? When have the ever been correct on anything? What's next? Jim Cramer's goofy opinions? Also CNBC has never taken the labour's side on anything (they have been running anti-UAW narrative wall to wall 24 hrs), so I doubt they have any insiders at the WGA. For strike to end tomorrow, the negotiating committee has to negotiate and accept the deal which would then be put to vote for members to ratify. I doubt all of this can be pulled off in a day rgeardless of what some CNBC pundit thinks. I am sure the pro-employer CNBC has no ulterior motive./s
In my never to be humble opinion, the real reason we’re seeing actual movement in the talks between the WGA and the Alliance is because the studios’ big guns are the ones speaking and not Carol Lombardini.
She’s insisted on using the outmoded negotiating tactics from 30 years ago. Well, guess what? Times have changed and those tactics are no longer acceptable.
Sadly, the likes of Zaslav, Iger and the like aren’t exactly heroes, either. But it’s finally time to see some movement. Where’s Lew Wasserman when you need him?
Please don’t take this too harshly Elaine, but your beat is the strike. CNBC’s David Faber just reported that the strike is likely to end tomorrow. (And if it doesn’t end tomorrow, then it won’t end until 2024.) That is major info that has to be in an update like this.
What cares what some pundit at CNBC has to say? When have the ever been correct on anything? What's next? Jim Cramer's goofy opinions? Also CNBC has never taken the labour's side on anything (they have been running anti-UAW narrative wall to wall 24 hrs), so I doubt they have any insiders at the WGA. For strike to end tomorrow, the negotiating committee has to negotiate and accept the deal which would then be put to vote for members to ratify. I doubt all of this can be pulled off in a day rgeardless of what some CNBC pundit thinks. I am sure the pro-employer CNBC has no ulterior motive./s
I'm going to tell you this one time, B Bong: Lay off the drugs
In my never to be humble opinion, the real reason we’re seeing actual movement in the talks between the WGA and the Alliance is because the studios’ big guns are the ones speaking and not Carol Lombardini.
She’s insisted on using the outmoded negotiating tactics from 30 years ago. Well, guess what? Times have changed and those tactics are no longer acceptable.
Sadly, the likes of Zaslav, Iger and the like aren’t exactly heroes, either. But it’s finally time to see some movement. Where’s Lew Wasserman when you need him?